HowToInstallHpInsightManagerAgentOnEsxiView and Download HP DL385 ProLiant G5 user manual online. HP ProLiant DL385 Generation 2 Server User Guide. DL385 ProLiant G5 Desktop pdf manual download. VMWESX6. 5. 0i40en1. Description VMware ESXi 6. NIC Driver for Intel Ethernet Controllers X710, XL710, XXV710, and X722. How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi' title='How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi' />Erics Blog ugh, yet another technology blog. Warning This post is clicking in at 6k words. If you are looking for a quick read, this isnt for you. Disclaimer Typical stuff, these are my personal views, not views of my employers. These are not facts, merely opinions and random thoughts Im writing down. Introduction I dont know about all of you, but for me, VMware has been an uninspiring company over the last couple of years. VMworld was a time when I used to get excited. It used to mean big new features were coming, and the platform would evolve in nice big steps. However, over the last 5 7 years, VMware has gotten progressively disappointing. My disappointment however is not limited to the products alone, but the company culture as well. This post will not follow a review format like many of you are used to seeing, but instead, will be more of a pointed list of the areas I feel need improvement. With that in mind, let it go on the record, that in my not so humble option, VMware is still the best damn virtualization solution. I bring these points up not to say that the product company sucks, but rather to outline that in many ways, VMware has lost its mojo, and IMO some of these areas would be good steps in recovering that. The products The death of ESXi You know, there are a lot of folks out there that want to say the hypervisor is a commodity. Typically, those folks are either pitching or have switched to a non VMware hypervisor. To me, theyre suffering from Stockholms syndrome. Heres the deal, ESXi kicks so much ass as a hypervisor. If you try to compare Hyper V, KVM, Xen or anything else to VMwares full featured ESXi, there is no competition. I dont give a crap about anything you will try to point out, youre wrong, plain and simple. Any argument you make will get shot down in a pile of flames. Even if you come at me with the product x is free Im still going to shoot you down. With that out of the way, its a no wonder that everyone is chanting the hypervisor commodity myth. I mean, lets be real here, what BIG innovation has been released to the general ESXi platform without some up charge  You cant count v. Ijiwaru My Master'>Ijiwaru My Master. SAN because thats a separate product more on the quotes later. Introduction I know what youre thinking, its 2017, why are you writing about virtualizing Microsoft SQL Most are doing it after all. And even if theyre not. HPPSPCleaner11A.gif' alt='How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi 5.5' title='How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi 5.5' />VOLs you say  Yeah, thats a nice feature, only took how long So, what else  How about the lack of trickle down and the elimination of Enterprise edition There was a time in VMwares history when features trickle down from Enterprise Plus Enterprise Standard. Usually it occurred each year, so by the time year three rolled around, that one feature in Enterprise Plus you were waiting for, finally got gifted to Standard edition. The last feature I recall this happening too, was the MPIO provider support, and that was ONLY so they could support v. VOLS on Standard edition TMK. Here is my view on this subject, VMware is making the myth of a commoditized hypervisor a self fulfilling prophecy. Not only is there a complete lack innovation, but theres no trickle down occurring. If you as a customer, have gone from receiving regular significant improvements as part of your maintenance agreement, to basically nothing year over year, why would you want to continue to invest in that product  Believe me, the thought has crossed my mind more than once. From what I understand, VMwares new business plan, is to make products like v. SAN that depend on ESXi, but that arent included with the ESXi purchase. Thus, a new revenue stream for VMware and renewed dependence on ESXi. First glance says it working, at least sort of, but is it really doing as well as it could  While it sounds like a great business model, if youre just comparing whether youre black red, what about the softer side of things  What is the customer perception of moving innovations to an al a carte model  For me, I wonder if they took the approach below, would it have had the same revenue impact they were looking for, while at the same time, also enabling a more positive customer perception  I think soFirst and foremost, VMware needs to make money. I know I just went through that whole diatribe above, but hear me out. This whole per socket model is dead. Its just not a sustainable licensing model for anyone. Microsoft started with SQL and has finally moved Windows to a per core model. In my opinion, VMware needs to evolve its licensing model in two directions. Per VM There are cases, where youre running monster VMs, and while youre certainly taking advantage of VMwares features, youre not getting anywhere near the same vale add as someone whos running 2. VMs per host.   Allowing customers to allocate per VM licenses to single host or an entire cluster would be a fair model for those that arent using virtualization for the overcommit, but for the flexibility. How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi 5.1' title='How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi 5.1' />OpenManage Essentials is available as a free download from the Dell Support Site. The OME consoles inventory function integrates with the Dell Repository Manager to. You can only upgrade the firmware on an ESX service console, because it requires Linux features. It cannot be done on ESXi. You will need to update using. VMware Site Recovery Manager SRM is a disaster recovery and business continuity solution from the VMware,which automates the transfer of virtual machines to a local or. This article will help you with the detailed step by step procedure to upgrade VMware vCenter server appliance 6. CSA 6. 5b using offline procedure. TemplateRefimprove This is a list of Internet socket port numbers used by protocols of the transport layer of the Internet Protocol Suite for the establishment of. How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi' title='How To Install Hp Insight Manager Agent On Esxi' />Per Core I know this is probably the one Im going to get the most grief from, but lets be real, YOU KNOW its fair. Lets just pretend, VMware wasnt the evil company that Microsoft is, and actually let you license as few as 2 cores at a time  For all of you VARs that have to support small businesses, or for all of you smaller business out there, how much likelier would you have just done a full blow ESXi implementation for your clients  Lets just say VMware charged 1. ESXi standard edition and your client had a quad core server. Would you think 6. I get that number simply by taking VMwares list price and dividing by 8 cores, which is exactly how Microsoft arrived at their trade ins for SQL and Windows. NOW, lets also say youre a larger company like mine and youre running enterprise plus. The new 4. Im looking at would normally cost 1. Enterprise Plus.   However, if we take my new per core model, that server would now cost 7. Thats approximately 2. VMware is losing out on for just ONE server. I know what youre thinking, Eric, why in the world would you want to pay more  I dont, but I also dont want a company that makes a kick ass product to stagnate, or worse crumble. Ive invested in a platform, and I want that platform to evolve. In order for VMware to evolve, it needs capital. Ok, now that we have the above out of the way, I want a hell of a lot more out of VMware for that kind of cash, so lets dig into that. SAN should have never been a separate product. Cdc Acm Driver Windows 7. Including v. SAN into that per core or per VM cost just like they do with Horizon, would add value into the platform. Lets be real, not everyone is going to use every feature of VMware. Im personally not a fan of v. SAN, but that doesnt mean I dont think I should be entitled to it. This could easily be something that is split among Standard and Enterprise plus editions. Yes, that also means the distributed switch would trickle down into Standard edition, which it should be by now. Similar to v. SAN, NSX should really be the new distributed switch. Im not sure exactly how to split it across the editions, but I think some form of NSX should be included with Standard, and the whole darn thing for Enterprise Plus. At this stage, I think its about time for Standard edition to really become the edition of the 8. Meaning, 8. 0 of the companies would have their needs met by Standard edition, and Enterprise plus is truly reserved for those that need the big bells and whistles. A few notable things I would like to trickle down to Standard Edition are as follows. A blog by Jonathan Frappier. In part 4 we published an application blueprint through Application Serivces, that is pretty awesome but we still really havent done anything just yet. I mean its all just about working but the real hard part is creating the application blueprints. Just for fun, lets create a generic blueprint and run a deployment. While logged into Application Services go to Applications and click on the green plus button to create a new application. Name the application and select a business group, if youve followed along my various home lab series you would select Star. Wars here since it is the only business group we gave permission to in v. Realize Automation. Click save, click Create Application Version then click Save. Now you are able to create a blueprint click Create Blueprint. Drag the logical template to the design pane, again if youre following along with me this would be the Cent. OS 6. 4 logical template. Now all this would do is create a virtual machine like you could do through v. Realize Automation or v. Sphere here however we also have several preconfigured services we can drag into our logical template to install applications. Lets do a typical single node web and database server. Drag Apache, v. Fabric Rabbit. MQ and and v. Fabric Postgres into the logical template, it should look something like this. Now one of the hardest parts about automating something is now all the dependencies. In this scenario I happen to know a few things are missing, not because I am a genius but because I went through several iterations of this blueprint before getting it to work. This, however also allows me to demo some other features of Application Services. In my Cent. OS template, SELinux is enabled now I could convert my template to a virtual machine, disable it, clean up the virtual machine machine again and convert it back to a template. Its what I would have done not 6 8 months ago. Cause We Got Style Pdf Converter there. Now, however, Ill simply use the tools available to me, tools like Application Services or Ansible to put the virtual machine into the state I want it From the Application Components page, drag two script items into the logical template. Edit the first script by clicking on it name it no spaces, click on Actions, click Click here to Edit, copy the following into the window and click the reboot checkboxbinbashset SELinux disabledcp etcselinuxconfig etcselinuxconfig. SELINUXpermissiveSELINUXdisabledg etcselinuxconfig. SELinux will now be disabled upon reboot. We also have to tweak the EPEL install to allow it to pull data properly seems to be a known issues right now. Rather than letting the EPEL package install as part of the services we used earlier, we can also do that in a script and configure the options we need for it to work. Edit the 2nd script as you did before but copy the following into the windowbinbashinstall EPELyum y install http dl. Click the OK button, you should now see something like this Now click the deploy button, name the deployment, and select the business group. Click Map Details, ensure all details match what you have setup, and click Next. Provide a name to your virtual machine and edit CPU and memory as needed and to match your v. RA blueprint limits click Next. Review the deployment blueprint and click Next. Click the deploy  button you could also publish to v. RA here as we did in part 4, but Im just demonstrating the deploymentThe deployment will start. Now at one point I wasnt sure it was working, I could see Application Services say it was working system was under 8. I wanted to see what v. Sphere was doing. As you an see in the two screenshots below, the virtual machines are being deployed as you might expect they are from two different deployments so yes the dates are different.